1
Utility
About UsConferencePartner With Us
  • Infrastructure
    Compliance
    Gas Control
    Grid
    Transmission and Distribution
  • Field Operations
    Utilities Field Service
    Utility Locating and Mapping
    Wastewater Treatment
  • Utility Intelligence
    Utilities AI
    Utilities Asset Management
    Utilities Billing
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • Magazines
  • CXO Awards
×
#

Utilities Tech Outlook Weekly Brief

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Utilities Tech Outlook

Subscribe

loading
THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

Weekly Brief

loading

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Utilities Tech Outlook Advisory Board.

NACHA-The Electronic Payments Association

Robert Unger, Senior Director, Product Management and Strategic Initiatives

Why Don't CFO's Track Payment Costs?

Do you hear that low hissss sound? Profits are slowly leaking from companies that overlook how profitability is impacted by how a customer pays, what information they provide, in addition to when they pay (DSO).

And the slow leak could hemorrhage with the coming tsunami of customer payment behavior changes, where, according to our research, B2B electronic payments will surpass check payments in 2020. It’s important for CFOs to get out in front of this sea change and develop a bulwark to contain escalating payment receipt costs. Tracking key metrics for payment receivables is a good start.

However, most companies, even the big, billion dollar plus annual revenue ones, have not implemented basic metrics for tracking and managing payment receipt costs. We here at NACHA know this, because we asked. In a collaborative survey NACHA did with the Credit Research Foundation, 75 percent of corporate respondents said they do not track payment receipt costs.

This is a missed opportunity for CFOs, credit, accounts receivable, treasury and related financial departments to further contribute to the bottom line.

When considering the “cost to serve” customers, companies are right to focus on profitability and pricing as it relates to the costs of raw materials, labor, development, production, delivery/fulfillment, marketing, sales, customer support, etc. But the associated financial costs regarding how a customer pays, what information they provide and related expenses to support customer payment choice impacts profitability too.

Measuring and managing payment receipt can lower the cost to serve customers, and increase profitability with every payment transaction. Success requires more than managing DSO and reviewing bank or card network fees. CFOs need to implement metrics for tracking “all in” payment receivables costs (e.g., costs and labor for reconciliation/cash application, exceptions/disputes, compliance, fraud controls, fraud loss, security, reporting and related services) to better understand how payment type (e.g., check, ACH, wire, card, cash) impacts profitability.

These data are powerful stuff, and should propel a coherent strategy for driving customers to the lowest cost, most efficient payment channel. With this data, CFOs can evaluate opportunities to incent (or discourage) customer payment behavior, and will know precisely how these changes impact profitability.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.
The Leadership Perspectives forum brings together voices shaping utilities technology and digital infrastructure. Participation is by invitation only. It features leaders who are not merely observing technological transformation, but actively contributing to it through innovation in grid and system management.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
  • Willis Towers Watson

    Con Edison Transmission, Inc [NYSE: ED]

    Con Edison Customers want Clean Energy: Technology And Companys Commitment are Making it Possible for them to Get it

    Walter Alvarado, Vice President, Electric Transmission, Con Edison Transmission, Inc.

  • Willis Towers Watson

    AVANGRID [NYSE: AGR]

    OptimizEV Helps Shape a Clean Energy Future

    Sean K. Sullivan, Senior Director - Clean Energy Policy, Avangrid

  • Willis Towers Watson

    California Water Service [NYSE: CWT]

    Consider an Audit Perspective to Enhance and Validate an Asset Management Program

    Stephen Harrison, Director of Asset Management/Interim Director of Internal Audit, California Water Service

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Alliant Energy [NASDAQ: LNT]

    Harnessing Technology in the Utility Sector

    Alberto Ruocco, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Alliant Energy

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

Utilities Tech Outlook
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@utilitiestechoutlook.com
  • sales@utilitiestechoutlook.com
  • marketing@utilitiestechoutlook.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 Utilities Tech Outlook. All rights reserved. Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

www.utilitiestechoutlook.com/views/why-don-t-cfo-s-track-payment-costs-nwid-219.html